1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2009 Kia Optima
To start off, 2009 Kia Optima is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Optima (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1991 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Optima (229 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Tempo | 2009 Kia Optima | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | Optima |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2305 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 229 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2730 mm |