1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Kia Venga
To start off, 2011 Kia Venga is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Venga (123 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1991 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Venga should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Venga weights approximately 193 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Venga. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Venga.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Tempo | 2011 Kia Venga | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | Venga |
Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2305 cc | 1591 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1343 kg |