1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1991 Ford Tempo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Tempo | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Tempo | Epica |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2305 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
