1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Tempo weights approximately 550 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Tempo | 2012 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Ford | Tata |
| Model | Tempo | Nano |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2305 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2230 mm |
