1991 Ford Tempo vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Because 2012 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC70 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Tempo. (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Tempo | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Tempo | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2305 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2815 mm |
