1991 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1991 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Thunderbird | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2380 mm |