1991 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1991 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1991 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Ford Thunderbird. (291 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Thunderbird | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 291 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 58 L |
