1991 Holden Apollo vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 644 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Holden Apollo | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Apollo | HRT |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
