1991 Holden Apollo vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1315 kg more than 1991 Holden Apollo.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Holden Apollo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Holden Apollo | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Apollo | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 2520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2650 mm |
