1991 Holden Apollo vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,455 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1991 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1991 Holden Apollo.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Holden Apollo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Holden Apollo (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Subaru Outback. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1991 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Holden Apollo | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Holden | Subaru |
| Model | Apollo | Outback |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2455 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
