1991 Holden Barina vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,324 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Holden Barina (67 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Holden Barina (105 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Holden Barina | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Barina | Clio |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2480 mm |