1991 Holden Nova vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Holden Nova (81 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 314 kg more than 1991 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 2 (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Holden Nova. (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Holden Nova | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Nova | 2 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2500 mm |