1991 Holden Statesman vs. 2002 Kia Rio

To start off, 2002 Kia Rio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 4,987 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Holden Statesman (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2002 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2002 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Holden Statesman weights approximately 545 kg more than 2002 Kia Rio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1991 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Holden Statesman (385 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Kia Rio. (113 Nm). This means 1991 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Kia Rio. 1991 Holden Statesman has automatic transmission and 2002 Kia Rio has manual transmission. 2002 Kia Rio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1991 Holden Statesman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: