1991 Honda CRX vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1991 Honda CRX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Honda CRX (150 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1991 Honda CRX.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Honda CRX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Honda CRX. (121 Nm). This means 1962 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Honda CRX.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Honda CRX | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Honda | Jeep |
Model | CRX | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1492 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2060 mm |