1991 Honda CRX vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Honda CRX would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Honda CRX (150 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 380 kg more than 1991 Honda CRX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Honda CRX. (121 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Honda CRX. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 1991 Honda CRX has manual transmission. 1991 Honda CRX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Honda CRX | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Honda | Lancia |
Model | CRX | Nea |
Year Released | 1991 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1492 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2590 mm |