1991 Honda CRX vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Honda CRX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Honda CRX would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Honda CRX (150 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Honda CRX. (121 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Honda CRX.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Honda CRX | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Honda | Holden |
Model | CRX | Epica |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1492 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2700 mm |