1991 Italdesign Nazca vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Italdesign Nazca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Italdesign Nazca would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Italdesign Nazca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Italdesign Nazca (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2002 Opel Omega. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Italdesign Nazca should accelerate faster than 2002 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Italdesign Nazca (470 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (300 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1991 Italdesign Nazca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Italdesign Nazca | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Italdesign | Opel |
Model | Nazca | Omega |
Year Released | 1991 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4988 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Top Speed | 297 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2740 mm |