1991 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1991 Jaguar XJ6. (224 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1991 Jaguar XJ6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Jaguar XJ6. (377 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Jaguar XJ6 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XJ6 | XF |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3980 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 377 Nm | 500 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2908 mm |