1991 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2013 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2013 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Jeep Cherokee would be higher.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Jeep Cherokee | 2013 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Cherokee | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |