1991 Lada Samara vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno

To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1991 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1991 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 141 kg more than 1991 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lada Samara.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Lada Samara 2006 Suzuki Reno
Make Lada Suzuki
Model Samara Reno
Year Released 1991 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1288 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 5550 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 98 Nm 178 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 924 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 4220 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2610 mm