1991 Lada Samara vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1991 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 301 kg more than 1991 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lada Samara | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | 3 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 924 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |