1991 Lamborghini LM002 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lamborghini LM002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lamborghini LM002 would be higher. At 5,167 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Lamborghini LM002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lamborghini LM002 (414 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ranger. (207 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lamborghini LM002 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Because 1991 Lamborghini LM002 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lamborghini LM002 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lamborghini LM002 (500 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Lamborghini LM002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Lamborghini LM002 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Lamborghini | Ford |
| Model | LM002 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5167 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 26.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 36 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 169 L | 74 L |
