1991 Lamborghini LM002 vs. 2011 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lamborghini LM002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lamborghini LM002 would be higher. At 5,167 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Lamborghini LM002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lamborghini LM002 (414 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2011 SsangYong Rodius. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lamborghini LM002 should accelerate faster than 2011 SsangYong Rodius. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Lamborghini LM002 weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2011 SsangYong Rodius. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lamborghini LM002 (500 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 SsangYong Rodius. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1991 Lamborghini LM002 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 SsangYong Rodius. 2011 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 1991 Lamborghini LM002 has manual transmission. 1991 Lamborghini LM002 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Lamborghini LM002 | 2011 SsangYong Rodius | |
| Make | Lamborghini | SsangYong |
| Model | LM002 | Rodius |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5167 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 3109 kg | 2034 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 27.4 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 169 L | 80 L |
