1991 Lancia Delta vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Lancia Delta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lancia Delta (208 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lancia Delta should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Because 1991 Lancia Delta is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lancia Delta will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lancia Delta (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1991 Lancia Delta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lancia Delta | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Delta | 3 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 55 L |