1991 Lincoln Continental vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 140 kg more than 1991 Lincoln Continental.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Lincoln Continental | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Lincoln | Toyota |
| Model | Continental | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3270 mm |
