1991 Lotus Elan vs. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 503 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 1942 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Lotus | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Elan | 6C |
Year Released | 1991 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3010 mm |