1991 Lotus Elan vs. 1957 Talbot 2500
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Talbot 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Talbot 2500 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Talbot 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1957 Talbot 2500. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1957 Talbot 2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Talbot 2500 weights approximately 3 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 1957 Talbot 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Talbot 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Talbot 2500 (196 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1957 Talbot 2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 1957 Talbot 2500 | |
Make | Lotus | Talbot |
Model | Elan | 2500 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1957 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 196 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |