1991 Lotus Elan vs. 1964 MG MGC
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1964 MG MGC. (149 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1964 MG MGC.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG MGC (174 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1964 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 1964 MG MGC | |
Make | Lotus | MG |
Model | Elan | MGC |
Year Released | 1991 | 1964 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 149 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |