1991 Lotus Elan vs. 1966 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,599 cc, 1966 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Crown. (98 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Toyota Crown weights approximately 378 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Toyota Crown (200 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1966 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Lotus Elan | 1966 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | Elan | Crown |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2599 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 98 HP |
| Torque | 143 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |
