1991 Lotus Elan vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 208 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda 626 (150 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | 626 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 150 Nm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |