1991 Lotus Elan vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 63 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (174 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Elan | 200 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |