1991 Lotus Elan vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Lotus Elan weights approximately 324 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lotus Elan (204 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1991 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Lotus Elan | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | Elan | Mini |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 204 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |
