1991 Lotus Elan vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Tribute. (122 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 428 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Tribute (175 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | Tribute |
Year Released | 1991 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 175 Nm |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |