1991 Lotus Elan vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1991 Lotus Elan. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | 3 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2261 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 257 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 94 mm |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |