1991 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | Pixo |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 68 HP |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2360 mm |