1991 Lotus Elan vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2013 Honda Fit. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Fit weights approximately 119 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Fit (144 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 2013 Honda Fit will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 2013 Honda Fit | |
Make | Lotus | Honda |
Model | Elan | Fit |
Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 144 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2500 mm |