1991 Lotus Elan vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2013 Kia RIO. (136 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia RIO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 99 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia RIO (167 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 2013 Kia RIO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Lotus Elan | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Lotus | Kia |
Model | Elan | RIO |
Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 136 HP |
Torque | 143 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 997 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2570 mm |