1991 Mahindra Armada vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mahindra Armada (74 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 790 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mahindra Armada | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4280 mm |
