1991 Mahindra Armada vs. 1963 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1400 kg more than 1963 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mahindra Armada | 1963 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Mahindra | Steyr |
| Model | Armada | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 2840 mm |
