1991 Mahindra Armada vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mahindra Armada | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
Model | Armada | Celica |
Year Released | 1991 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4380 mm |