1991 Mahindra Armada vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 520 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1991 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mahindra Armada | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mahindra | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Armada | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5530 mm |
