1991 Mahindra Armada vs. 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,393 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1991 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 1991 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 427 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mahindra Armada | 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| Make | Mahindra | Suzuki |
| Model | Armada | Grand Vitara |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1573 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4300 mm |
