1991 Mazda 121 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1991 Mazda 121. (71 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 968 kg more than 1991 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mazda 121. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mazda 121 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 121 | CTS |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1322 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 83.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1788 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 68 L |