1991 Mazda 626 vs. 1971 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1991 Mazda 626 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1971 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mazda 626 | 1971 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Mazda | ZAZ |
Model | 626 | 966 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 885 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2170 mm |