1991 Mazda 626 vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1991 Mazda 626 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mazda 626 (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1991 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mazda 626 | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | 626 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
