1991 Mazda 626 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1991 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1991 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (167 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mazda 626 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 626 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 91.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |