1991 Mazda 626 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mazda 626 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | 626 | Colt |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2970 mm |