1991 Mazda 626 vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mazda 626 | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | 626 | Ram |
Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2900 mm |