1991 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1991 Mazda MX-3. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1991 Mazda MX-3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mazda MX-3. (133 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mazda MX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mazda MX-3 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | MX-3 | Epica |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |