1991 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1991 Mazda RX-7. (197 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1991 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mazda RX-7. (270 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mazda RX-7 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | RX-7 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 74 L |
